LUVTruck.com

phpBBV3 Message Board
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:30 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:52 am 
Offline
Addicted to LUV
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:11 am
Posts: 2803
Location: Baytown,Texas
240_jon wrote:
OK, here is what concerns me most. I know that there is a mount kit available for the buick V6, but is the 2000 Camaro the same casting? ie. Are the mounts on the same place on the block?


Idk if the mounts are the same , but mine has 155,000 on it . I bought the car new for my oldest daughter and bought it back for my youngest . Definatly a good motor . You will want to replace the plastic heater elbows while you have it out and GM makes steel elbows that install into the idler pulley assembly to use standard heater hose . Also mine is sensitive to fuel pressure .


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:12 pm 
Offline
lives at LUVTruck.com

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:57 am
Posts: 357
Location: Minden, Nevada
If you have the Buick V6, they are the same as the earlier Buick V6's. If you have the Chevy V6 then they are different as that is a shortened SB engine. Mounts are available for it (4.3L Chevy) from www.powerbyace.com

_________________
The light at the end of the tunnel, may just be a train coming!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:31 pm 
Offline
Addicted to LUV
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:11 am
Posts: 2803
Location: Baytown,Texas
Found this info :
Series II
Introduced in 1995, the Series II is quite a different engine. Although the stroke for the 3.8 L engine remained at 3.4 in (86 mm), and the bore remained at 3.8 in (97 mm), the engine architecture was vastly changed. The deck height is shorter than the Series I, reducing weight and total engine package size. This required that the piston connecting rods be shortened 1 in (25 mm), and the crankshaft was also redesigned. A new intake manifold improved breathing while a redesigned cylinder head featured larger valves and a higher compression ratio. The result was 205 hp (153 kW) and 230 lb·ft (312 N·m), better fuel economy, and 26 lb (12 kg) lighter overall weight (to 392 lb (178 kg)). The 3800 weighs only 22 lb (10.0 kg) more than the High Feature V6, despite being an all cast iron design.

The new intake manifold greatly improved breathing. To meet emissions standards, an EGR tube was placed in the intake manifold to reduce combustion temperatures. This increases fuel mileage by a substantial margin.

The 3800 Series II was on the Ward's 10 Best Engines list for 1995 through 1997


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:37 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:40 am
Posts: 71
Location: Tucson, AZ
hotrod80 wrote:
Found this info :
Series II
Introduced in 1995, the Series II is quite a different engine. Although the stroke for the 3.8 L engine remained at 3.4 in (86 mm), and the bore remained at 3.8 in (97 mm), the engine architecture was vastly changed. The deck height is shorter than the Series I, reducing weight and total engine package size. This required that the piston connecting rods be shortened 1 in (25 mm), and the crankshaft was also redesigned. A new intake manifold improved breathing while a redesigned cylinder head featured larger valves and a higher compression ratio. The result was 205 hp (153 kW) and 230 lb·ft (312 N·m), better fuel economy, and 26 lb (12 kg) lighter overall weight (to 392 lb (178 kg)). The 3800 weighs only 22 lb (10.0 kg) more than the High Feature V6, despite being an all cast iron design.

The new intake manifold greatly improved breathing. To meet emissions standards, an EGR tube was placed in the intake manifold to reduce combustion temperatures. This increases fuel mileage by a substantial margin.

The 3800 Series II was on the Ward's 10 Best Engines list for 1995 through 1997


Nice! I think I could find one of those really easy!

OldRob, if I am looking at that particular mount kit and I have one of the 95-97 camaro 3800, is that what I'm going to need? I just don't want to buy it and not be able to use it


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group